Look, I get it. You want that shiny Wikipedia page for your business or yourself. Feels like a badge of legitimacy, right? But here's the kicker – about 90% of new pages get deleted within days. I learned that the hard way when my first attempt vanished faster than my morning coffee. Today I'll save you the frustration I went through.
Reality check: Making a Wikipedia page isn't like posting on social media. It's more like applying for a passport – tons of rules and zero tolerance for mistakes.
What Most People Mess Up Before They Even Start
Everyone jumps straight into writing. Bad idea. Wikipedia's notability rules are brutal. My neighbor spent weeks writing about his bakery only to get rejected because local newspaper mentions weren't enough.
Entity Type | Proof You'll Need | Common Pitfalls |
---|---|---|
Business/Company | Major industry awards, features in national publications, documented impact on industry | Press releases don't count. Company blog mentions? Forget it. |
Person (Artist/Author) | Book deals with major publishers, international exhibitions, critical reviews in established outlets | Self-published books? Usually not enough. Personal websites? Worthless. |
Non-Profit Org | National legislation influenced, UN recognition, documented large-scale humanitarian impact | Local food drives won't cut it. Needs verifiable large-scale impact. |
My Notability Checklist That Actually Works
Before wasting 40 hours writing, run through this:
- Do you have at least 3 independent sources? (Not your mom's blog or company site)
- Are those sources major publications? Think New York Times level, not "Top10Bakers.com"
- Is the coverage substantial? A name-drop in paragraph 17 doesn't count
- Are sources accessible online or through library archives? (Wikipedia volunteers won't hunt)
Honestly? If you're hesitating on any point, reconsider investing time. Wikipedia's deletion process feels personal when it happens to you.
The Step-By-Step Creation Process Demystified
Okay, you passed the notability test. Now what? Most tutorials skip the landmines. Let's walk through:
Account Setup (Where Beginners Screw Up)
Creating your account seems simple until you realize:
- Username matters: "BestLawyer2024" looks promotional. Use something neutral like "JSmith_Editor"
- Make small edits first: Fix typos on existing pages for 2 weeks. Shows you're not just here to make a wikipedia page about yourself
- Enable email confirmation: Otherwise you can't recover the account when you inevitably forget the password
Drafting Your Page (The Make-or-Break Phase)
This is where I see most failures happen:
Section | Do's | Don'ts |
---|---|---|
Introduction | Neutral tone: "XYZ Corporation manufactures industrial valves" | "The revolutionary leader in valve technology" (delete magnet) |
History | Cite founding date with business registry documents | Personal anecdotes about the founder's childhood dreams |
Awards | Include only major industry awards with third-party verification | "Best Local Business 2023" awards from chamber of commerce |
Pro tip: Write in third-person like you hate the subject. Seriously. Detachment is key.
Source formatting traps: Use Wikipedia's built-in citation tool (the "Cite" button). Hand-coding references? You'll mess up. I did. Got flagged immediately.
Submitting Through Articles for Creation (AFC)
Never just publish directly unless you want instant deletion. The AFC process is your safety net:
- Tag your draft with
{{subst:AFC submission}}
at the top - Include all sources in preview mode before submitting
- Check AFC dashboard daily - reviewers ask questions fast
My first AFC submission got rejected in 8 hours because I forgot to add ISBN numbers for book citations. Brutal.
Why Your Page Will Get Flagged (And How to Fight Back)
Even if you do everything right, expect criticism. Wikipedia's culture leans skeptical. Common flags:
Flag Type | What It Means | Your Response Strategy |
---|---|---|
Speedy Deletion (G4/G11) | "Page is unambiguous advertising" or "Clearly not notable" | Immediately remove promotional language and add stronger sources to talk page |
Neutrality Dispute | "Tone reads like a press release" | Rewrite entire sections removing adjectives. "Groundbreaking" → "described as innovative by TechReview" |
Source Challenges | "Sources lack independence/reliability" | Replace with mainstream publications ASAP. Pay for newspaper archives if needed |
During the debate phase:
- Always assume good faith (even when insulted)
- Never edit war - that's instant loss
- Cite policies like WP:ORGCRIT when defending
Real talk: I once spent 3 weeks debating a stubborn editor. Finally won by finding a 1998 Times mention on microfiche at the library. Sometimes you must out-stubborn them.
The Hidden Maintenance Nightmare Nobody Mentions
Getting the page live is only halftime. Wikipedia pages need constant care:
Ongoing Tasks After Making a Wikipedia Page
Vandal Patrol | Check page weekly for graffiti or negative edits |
Reference Updates | Replace dead links with archive.org versions |
Update Blitzes | Add new awards/events within 48 hours with citations |
Talk Page Monitoring | Respond to criticism within 24 hours |
Set Google Alerts for your page title. My client's page almost got deleted when someone tagged it "non-notable" on a Sunday night. Caught it at 2AM.
Professional Alternatives When DIY Fails
Sometimes, making a wikipedia page yourself isn't feasible. Professional services exist but:
Service Type | Average Cost | Red Flags | Legit Indicators |
---|---|---|---|
"Guaranteed Approval" Services | $800 - $2000 | Promises of "connections" with editors | Emphasis on notability research only |
Wikipedia Consulting | $150-$300/hour | Offers to write directly for you | Trains you to write/edit independently |
Media Outreach Packages | $5000+ | "We'll create notability for you" | Focuses on legitimate PR campaigns |
My brutal opinion? Most "guaranteed" services are scams. Wikipedia explicitly prohibits paid advocacy. You might get a page that lasts 3 months then disappears.
Ethical alternative: Hire a consultant to teach you Wikipedia editing for 3 hours ($450). Then DIY properly forever. Cheaper and safer.
Real Answers to Burning Wikipedia Questions
How long does making a Wikipedia page take from start to finish?
Honestly? Budget 40-60 hours if you're new. Research (15hrs), drafting (20hrs), AFC process (1-4 weeks), and defending (10hrs). My quickest successful page took 3 weeks. Longest? 9 months fighting deletion debates.
Can I make a wikipedia page about myself as an entrepreneur?
Technically yes, but it's the hardest path. Requires: Forbes 30 Under 30, TED Talk with 1M+ views, or founding a unicorn startup. Otherwise, focus on making a wikipedia page for your company instead.
What's the single biggest reason pages get deleted?
Lack of independent sources (over 70% of cases). Not "bad writing" or "formatting." I've seen beautifully written pages vanish because sources were company newsletters.
How much does it cost to make a Wikipedia page professionally?
Legit consultants charge $100-$300/hour. Typical project runs $3k-$15k. Beware anyone charging flat fees under $2k - they often use black hat methods that backfire.
Can I pay Wikipedia directly to create a page?
Absolutely not. The Wikimedia Foundation doesn't offer this. Anyone claiming they'll "expedite" your page for money is lying. Donating $50 won't make your draft move faster either.
Final reality check: Creating a Wikipedia page shouldn't be your top marketing priority unless you've got mainstream media coverage already. Focus on getting featured in major publications first - then the Wikipedia page becomes possible.
Look, I won't sugarcoat it. Making a wikipedia page that sticks is brutal. My first three attempts failed miserably. But when you finally see that blue link live? Worth every gray hair. Just don't expect it to solve your SEO or credibility issues overnight. It's a marathon with Wikipedia-shaped landmines.
Still determined to try? Start with notability research today. Find those sources before writing a single word. Trust me, it'll save you weeks of heartbreak.